Vast Zoning Change Eyed at Morena

San Diego officials are proposing major zoning changes near planned trolley stations along Morena Boulevard that would allow 10-story housing projects and revamp much of the street grid between Interstate 5 and the University of San Diego.

The goal is helping solve the city’s severe lack of housing with dense projects along a new trolley line connecting Old Town and the University of California San Diego. The line is expected to begin operations in 2021.



The proposal, called the Morena Corridor Specific Plan, also includes new protected paths for bicyclists and pedestrians, an artisan district, a linear park along Tecolote Road, wider sidewalks, public plazas and urban greens.

The plan covers a 280-acre area that follows the path of the new trolley line in Clairemont and Linda Vista, then extends east to include the existing Linda Vista/Moreno trolley station on the green line.
The two new trolley stations in the plan will be where Morena Boulevard crosses Clairemont Drive and where Morena Boulevard crosses Tecolote.

By creating a significantly revamped growth blueprint for the area over the next 20 to 30 years, the plan aims to transform a mostly blighted, auto-oriented industrial area into a vibrant and dense trolley-oriented village.

Supporters say the plan will serve as a model for transit-oriented development in San Diego, which will help solve the housing shortage without the urban sprawl that worsens pollution, climate change and traffic congestion.

Critics, including many nearby residents, say dense housing in the plan would damage the character of the area, worsen traffic congestion and block views of Mission Bay from houses in Overlook Heights and Bay Park.

They also contend the plan overestimates how many residents will use the trolley instead of vehicles and fails to require that a significant portion of the new housing be reserved for people with low incomes.

The plan would increase the height limit in the specific plan area from 30 feet to at least 45 feet, and up to 65 feet near the existing Linda Vista/Moreno trolley station and up to 100 feet near the Tecolote station.

Those higher height limits would allow dense housing projects and increase the number of housing units in the area from just under 1,000 to just over 7,000.

Meanwhile, the square footage of commercial and industrial development in the area would shrink from 2.9 million to 2.5 million.

The proposal is similar in nature to a new growth blueprint city officials are proposing for the area surrounding the Balboa Avenue station on the new trolley line.

That plan aims to transform the northeast corner of Pacific Beach from an auto-oriented commercial corridor into a dense residential village. The San Diego City Council is expected to consider both plans for approval in 2019.

A recent report by the San Diego Housing Commission concluded that rezoning residential areas within a half-mile radius of transit will be the largest single tool for adding housing in San Diego.

The report also noted that such housing is more likely to include units affordable to low-income and moderate-income families than development in other locations. The San Diego Planning Commission says the city needs dense projects along the new trolley line if officials hope to secure federal money for future trolley projects.

In October, commissioners complained that the first major housing project proposed along the new trolley line isn’t dense enough because the developer is proposing 150 condos instead of a potential 300.

Residents who oppose lifting the 30-foot height limit praised the project as a model for how the city can allow dense middle-class housing without destroying neighborhood character or ignoring the concerns of residents.
The project, which the City Council is scheduled to approve on Tuesday, would replace a decaying recreational vehicle park on the east side of Morena Boulevard near Frankfort Street and Tonopah Avenue.

The residents, many of whom are part of a group called Raise the Balloon, successfully lobbied the Linda Vista Community Planning Group to raise a significant series of objections to the Morena Corridor Specific Plan.

In addition to concerns about bay views, traffic and the lack of income-restricted housing, the planning group raised concerns about parking, how the city will pay for infrastructure upgrades needed to support the new housing and plans to shrink Morena Boulevard from four lanes to three.

They also complained that city officials appear to have completely disregarded their comments during a series of public meetings dating back nearly three years.

“The plan is so at odds with the community input as to strongly suggest that the Planning Department had a predetermined outcome and the ‘collaborate process’ was so much ‘checking the box’ of public participation,” said Howard Wayne, chairman of a planning group subcommittee focused on the plan.

The planning group also complained that the plan would gentrify Linda Vista, which they contend has long been a working-class neighborhood, and make it unaffordable for many of the people living there.

Noli Zosa, chairman of the planning group, said by phone on Friday that the increase in the height limit is the main concern raised by residents, primarily residents in Overlook Heights and Bay Park who are worried about their loss of bay views.

“It's a hard crowd to please, partly because they are concerned about their property values,” he said, adding that as many as 200 angry residents sometimes attend planning group meetings focused on height limits.

“They are organized and vocal, and they are very concerned about the density and the height.”

Zosa said there is nearly unanimous support for revamping the street grid. That would include establishing a more traditional grid pattern by aligning public streets or private drives with Vega, Dorcas and Buenos streets at West Morena Boulevard.

The plan would also extend Knoxville and Sherman streets to Morena Boulevard and extend Morena to Linda Vista Road. In addition, several “Y” shaped intersections would be reconfigured as “T” shaped intersections, and a few existing streets would be eliminated by new developments.





DISCLAIMER: This blog/article has been curated from an alternate source and is designed for informational purposes to highlight the commercial real estate market. It solely represents the opinion of the specific blogger/author and does not necessarily represent the opinion of Pacific Coast Commercial. 

All content provided on this blog is for informational purposes only. The owner of this blog makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site.  The owner of will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information.

Keywords: San Diego Commercial Real Estate For Sale, Commercial Property In San Diego, Commercial Real Estate In San Diego, San Diego Investment Real Estate, Commercial Property Management In San Diego, San Diego Commercial Property Management, Commercial Property Management in San Diego, Managed Commercial Property in San Diego, Commercial Property For in Sale San Diego, San Diego Commercial Real Estate Leasing, Top Real Estate Agents in San Diego, Commercial Property in San Diego, Property Management Company in San Diego, Real Estate Agents in San Diego, San Diego Commercial Real Estate, Commercial Real Estate San Diego, Commercial Real Estate Company in San Diego, San Diego Commercial Real Estate Company, San Diego Commercial Real Estate

Comments

Popular Posts