Big-Box Space Remains Hard to Fill
July 31, 2012
Many shopping centers that lost Borders after the chain announced its liquidation are suffering high vacancies, falling rents and even debt defaults.
Close to a year after
Borders Group Inc. collapsed, commercial real estate in San Diego and suburban shopping centers still are
struggling to fill the vacated big-box space—and to cope with changes in the
way Americans shop.
Many shopping centers that lost Borders after the chain announced its liquidation are suffering high vacancies, falling rents and even debt defaults.
Values have been falling
in particular for the suburban shopping centers that rely heavily on big-box
stores and have been bearing the brunt of the impact from online retail
competition.
Take the case of the
Regency Park Shopping Center, outside of Kansas City, Kan. The former Borders
store there stayed shuttered for months, and when its landlord—Dallas-based
real-estate investor Henry S. Miller Cos.—finally filled it with a Natural
Grocers, the rent was “significantly lower,” said Greg Miller, a senior vice
president.
By then Regency Park had
defaulted on its $25 million mortgage. The center has a vacancy of 30%, and its
value had declined to $9.3 million in December, from $32.8 million in 2006,
according to loan data provided by Trepp LLC, a debt-analysis firm.
“It’s been a
two-steps-forward, one-step-back deal,” Mr. Miller said.
A new survey of 205
closed Borders stores shows that one-third are still vacant. Those stores that
filled the former Borders space are leasing at rates roughly 30% lower on
average than what Borders paid.
Some landlords have been
reluctant to, in effect, take the lower rents that retailers are offering to
pay. Now that they’re going on sitting vacant for roughly a year,
landlords will be a little more practical.
Some popular malls and
downtown shopping areas have been able to replace Borders without cutting rents
thanks to their locations and appeal to residents and tourists.
But many big-box centers
that depended on stalwarts like Borders, Best Buy Co. and Office Max have
suffered higher vacancy, weaker cash flows and other problems as these
retailers have closed or shrunken stores. San Diego commercial real estate leasing is experiencing the same problems.
After the Oaks Square
Shopping Center, in Gainesville, Fla., lost its Borders, other tenants demanded
rent decreases to make up for the fact that their big-name neighbor had gone
dark, according to Trepp. The landlord, Retail Property Group, replaced Borders
early this year with shoe seller DSW Inc., DSW -11.34%but the servicer
overseeing the center’s $14.6 million mortgage started foreclosure proceedings
last February. Retail Property, which has sued the servicer in an effort to pay
off its loan at a reduced amount, declined to comment.
The vacancy problem is
affecting far more than commercial real estate in San Diego. Among those still looking to fill a
Borders vacancy is the Watters Creek shopping center in the Dallas suburb of
Allen, Texas. “We have a [tenant] looking at taking the entire thing, but we
haven’t made a deal yet,” said Terry Montesi, chief executive of Watters
Creek’s owner, Trademark Property Co.
Some industry watchers
believe that big-box centers are facing problems that go beyond a weak economy.
Rather, they suggest that these shopping centers are going to suffer long-term
declines because Internet shopping offers more choice and greater ease.
“When [the big-box
format] originated, it was about wide selection in a certain category,” said Suzanne
Mulvee, retail strategist at CoStar Group, a real-estate-research company.
“They had the biggest selection, and that’s why you’d go there. Now the biggest
selection is online. So I am concerned about this sector long-term.”
Many shopping centers
that lost Borders after the chain announced its liquidation are suffering high
vacancies, falling rents and even debt defaults. Above, a vacant Borders store
in Allen, Texas.
Overall, national
vacancy statistics on big-box centers don’t appear too grim, and new
construction is scant. With some retailers expanding, like DSW and Ross Stores
Inc., ROST +1.45%the vacancy rate has declined to 6.6% after hitting a
multiyear high of 7.9% in 2009, according to CoStar. Even so, rents are near
the lowest level they have hit since 2006, and the vacancy rate is rising again
and will likely hit 6.8% by the end of the year because of more closings,
CoStar reports.
Some large landlords,
including some in San Diego commercial real estate leasing, are better positioned to keep their big-box
centers filled because they have more clout with retailers and better
properties. DDR Corp., DDR +0.79%which counts many big-box centers among its
469 properties, posted average occupancy of 93.7% in the first quarter, up from
92.6% a year earlier.
“We’ve replaced Linens
and Circuit with Bed Bath & Beyond, BBBY +0.80%Marshalls, Ross, Wal-Mart,
WMT +0.38%” said Paul Freddo, DDR’s senior executive vice president of leasing
and development, referring to the closed Linens ‘n Things Inc. and Circuit City
Stores Inc. “We sit here three years later a much better company because of
it.”
But California developer
Peter Pau also is giving up on the big-box concept in the Bay Area suburb of
Newark, where this year he bulldozed most of his Mowry Crossings shopping
center. The 200,000-square-foot center had only one viable tenant—a BJ’s
Restaurant—after losing its Mervyns, Circuit City, Petsmart and Babies “R” Us.
Mr. Pau still owns the project because he had paid its mortgage, but he now
intends to rebuild it as a retail format other than big-box commercial real estate in San Diego.
“It is no longer a
power-center,” Mr. Pau said. “We aren’t banking on big-box tenants.”
Source: Wall Street
Journal
DISCLAIMER: This blog has been curated from an
alternate source and is designed for informational purposes to highlight the
commercial real estate market. It solely represents the opinion of the specific
blogger and does not necessarily represent the opinion of Pacific Coast
Commercial.
Comments
Post a Comment