New Developments In The Covered Bond Market
September 17, 2012
Covered bonds are a way
to increase credit flow to the San Diego commercial real estate leasing industry.
A covered bond is a way
for a bank to issue a bond backed by a pool of real estate assets that are
backed not only by the assets contained therein, but also by the bank’s promise
to repay.
NAR has been advocating
for a commercial bond market because of the benefits it would bring to the San Diego commercial real estate leasing industry in terms of credit availability. An
April podcast by NAR Treasurer Bill Armstrong discusses the market and
regulations on the table.
What’s new this month is
that ratings agency Fitch seems to be working ahead of the coming growth in
covered bonds by adjusting their rating criteria for covered bonds. Those of
you recalling Fitch’s (and Moody’s and S&P’s) enormous roles in enabling
the 2008 subprime mortgage meltdown might be surprised to learn that ratings
agencies actually have criteria they use to make their ratings, but
indeed, they do, which affects the San Diego commercial real estate leasing industry, and here’s Fitch’s new rules for
covered bonds:
Fitch has made several
changes to its criteria, all of them being limited in terms of rating impact.
The three main changes
are the introduction of a benefit for tenant granularity, the consideration of
additional securities related to the cover assets, and an adjustment of the
default modelling for loans secured by multifamily properties (MFH).
With the updated
methodology, Fitch recognizes the benefit of tenant granularity in its recovery
analysis for loans that are assumed to default immediately based on their
current property income. Whereas previously the assumed property income was
adjusted downwards under the assumption that all tenants would default in a
stress scenario, now Fitch uses a rating dependent default rate to adjust the
property income until lease expiry. Additional securities will now be
considered in the recovery analysis if they are solely available for the
benefit of the bondholders, held in cash or highly rated sovereign bonds, and
assumed to have a material impact on the portfolio’s expected loss.
SOURCE: Wayne Grohl, The
Source – Commercial Source
DISCLAIMER: This blog has
been curated from an alternate source and is designed for informational
purposes to highlight the commercial real estate market. It solely represents
the opinion of the specific blogger and does not necessarily represent the
opinion of Pacific Coast Commercial.
Comments
Post a Comment